Pharmacokinetic comparison of two valproic acid formulations: a plain and a controlled release enteric-coated tablets.
10.3346/jkms.1993.8.4.251
- Author:
Joung Ho RHA
1
;
In Jin JANG
;
Kyung Hoon LEE
;
Won Seok CHONG
;
Sang Goo SHIN
;
Namsoo LEE
;
Ho Jin MYUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Clinical Trial ; Comparative Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Valproic acid;
Controlled release;
Bioavailability;
Fluctuation
- MeSH:
Administration, Oral;
Adult;
Biological Availability;
Delayed-Action Preparations;
Epilepsy/blood/*drug therapy;
Humans;
Male;
Tablets;
Tablets, Enteric-Coated;
Valproic Acid/*pharmacokinetics
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
1993;8(4):251-256
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
We investigated the single- and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of a new controlled-release formulation (Orfil retard enteric coated tablet) of valproic acid in comparison with those of the plain tablet as a reference. Twelve healthy volunteers were given each formulation of 300 mg in the single-dose study. In the steady-state multiple-dose study, twelve epileptic patients received 1200 mg/day of the reference drug (300 mg 9 AM, 300 mg 3 PM, 600 mg 9 PM) and the test formulation (600 mg 9 AM, 600 mg 9 PM) with at least one week interval in cross-over manner. The AUC values of the test controlled release formulation were 91.7% (95% confidence interval: 78.4-100.4%) of the reference drug in the single-dose study and 98.2% (95% confidence interval: 86.2%-109.9%) in the steady-state study. The AUC's of the two formulations were not significantly different by ANOVA test. The Cmax and Tmax values of the test formulation were significantly different from the values of the reference in single-(Tmax: 158.4%, Cmax: 52.5% of the reference) and multiple-dose study (Tmax: 153.5% of the reference). The MRT values of the test formulation were also significantly greater (129.4% of the reference) in the single-dose study. Regarding the controlled-release characteristics of the test formulation, fluctuation index and percentage fluctuation of the twice a day dosage regimen of the test formulation were comparable with those of the thrice a day dosage regimen of the conventional tablet. Area deviation was even smaller in the test regimen of the controlled release formulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
