Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm in CT: Effect on Image Quality Compared with Filtered Back Projection in Body Phantoms of Different Sizes.
10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.195
- Author:
Milim KIM
1
;
Jeong Min LEE
;
Jeong Hee YOON
;
Hyoshin SON
;
Jin Woo CHOI
;
Joon Koo HAN
;
Byung Ihn CHOI
Author Information
1. College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Evaluation Studies ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Adaptive iterative dose reduction;
CT, phantom study;
Body sizes
- MeSH:
*Algorithms;
Animals;
Body Size;
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/*methods;
*Phantoms, Imaging/standards;
Radiation Dosage;
Signal-To-Noise Ratio;
Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal/*radiography;
Swine;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2014;15(2):195-204
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) three-dimensional (3D) algorithm in CT on noise reduction and the image quality compared to the filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm and to compare the effectiveness of AIDR 3D on noise reduction according to the body habitus using phantoms with different sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different-sized phantoms with diameters of 24 cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm were built up using the American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom and layers of pork belly fat. Each phantom was scanned eight times using different mAs. Images were reconstructed using the FBP and three different strengths of the AIDR 3D. The image noise, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the phantom were assessed. Two radiologists assessed the image quality of the 4 image sets in consensus. The effectiveness of AIDR 3D on noise reduction compared with FBP were also compared according to the phantom sizes. RESULTS: Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D significantly reduced the image noise compared with FBP and enhanced the SNR and CNR (p < 0.05) with improved image quality (p < 0.05). When a stronger reconstruction algorithm was used, greater increase of SNR and CNR as well as noise reduction was achieved (p < 0.05). The noise reduction effect of AIDR 3D was significantly greater in the 40-cm phantom than in the 24-cm or 30-cm phantoms (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The AIDR 3D algorithm is effective to reduce the image noise as well as to improve the image-quality parameters compared by FBP algorithm, and its effectiveness may increase as the phantom size increases.
