Pseudo-obstruction of the Portal Vein in Hepatic Transplantation and Liver Resection: Case Reports.
- Author:
Jun Woo KIM
1
;
Yoon Jin HWANG
;
Young Kook YUN
;
Yang Il KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Taegu, Korea.
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
Pseudo-obstruction;
Portal vein;
Hepatic transplantation
- MeSH:
Angiography;
Biliary Atresia;
Female;
Humans;
Infant;
Liver Transplantation*;
Liver*;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Portal Vein*;
Recurrence;
Surgical Procedures, Operative;
Thrombosis;
Tissue Donors;
Ultrasonography;
Veins
- From:Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
1999;3(1):87-92
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Confirmation of patency of the portal vein by either ultrasound or angiography is important for evaluating patients considered for living-related liver transplant(LRLT) and liver resection(LR). Portal vein thrombosis(PVT) in LRLT necessitates planning for a technically difficult operation because consideration must be given to obtaining an alternative for splanchnic inflow. When performing LR for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), portal vein tumor thrombus was usually thought of as a poor prognositic factor for tumor recurrence. Recently, we experienced two cases of pseudo-obstruction of the portal vein, one in LRLT and the other in LR. In the case of LRLT, a 16-month-old female patient was diagnosed as congenital biliary atresia. PVT had been preoperatively suggested, but the vein was actually open. The patient was successfully transplanted using the left lateral segment of the donor with ordinary portal vein anastomosis and the postoperative course was uneventful except for mild acute rejection episodes. In the case of LR, a 60-year-old male patient presented with incidental symptoms. Preoperative ultrasonography, computed tomography, and angiography showed a 9x8cm-sized mass in the right lobe of the liver with obstruction of the right portal vein, which suggested tumor thrombus. However, the operation disclosed the patency of the portal vein and a right lobectomy was subsequently done. Because of the scanty blood flow of the portal vein due to arterio-portal shunt, PVT was preoperatively suggested. Our experience indicates that more sophisticated image studies are needed for evaluating portal vein patency in the patient who needs hepatic transplant as well as liver resection, and that the surgeon should not hesitate to procede to operative procedures even though conventional studies suggest PVT.
