Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Patients With ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea.
10.4070/kcj.2009.39.8.297
- Author:
Doo Sun SIM
1
;
Ju Han KIM
;
Myung Ho JEONG
Author Information
1. The Heart Research Center of Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. myungho@chollian.net
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Coronary artery disease;
Prognosis
- MeSH:
Coronary Artery Disease;
Death;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Incidence;
Korea;
Male;
Myocardial Infarction;
Prevalence;
Prognosis;
Survival Rate;
Ventricular Function, Left
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
2009;39(8):297-303
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
In Korea, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction has been increasing rapidly. Twelve-month clinical outcomes for 13,133 patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the nationwide prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry study were analyzed according to the presence or absence of ST-segment elevation. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were younger, more likely to be men and smokers, and had poorer left ventricular function with a higher incidence of cardiac death compared to patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). NSTEMI patients had a higher prevalence of 3-vessel and left main coronary artery disease with complex lesions, and were more likely to have co-morbidities. The in-hospital and 1-month survival rates were higher in NSTEMI patients than in STEMI patients. However, 12-month survival rates was not different between the two groups. In conclusion, NSTEMI patients have worse clinical outcomes than STEMI patients, and therefore should be treated more intensively during clinical follow-up.
