The comparison of survival of the venous flaps according to the location of pedicle and the treatment of superoxide dismutase in the rabbit auricle.
- Author:
Jong Woo CHOI
;
Sang Tae AHN
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Ear Cartilage;
New Zealand;
Rabbits;
Skin;
Superoxide Dismutase*;
Superoxides*;
Surgical Flaps;
Survival Rate;
Veins
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
1998;25(4):538-546
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
It has been generally believed that the continuous flow of blood characterised by arterial inflow and venous outflow is essential for the survival of flaps. Since Baek et al.(1985) demonstrated the survival of a flap based on only a single vein without arterial inflow, there have been a lot of reports of successful skin flaps that depend on only venous blood flow. The location of pedicle is one of the important factors on the survival of flaps, but there have not been an effective study on the survival rates of venous island flaps according to their location of pedicles. In this study, we compared the survival rates of proximally based venous island flaps with those of distally based ones and attempted to decrease the difference, if any, in the survival rates between them. Distally or proximally based 4x3 cmvenous island flap, whose pedicle was a marginal branch of central vein, was elevated from the auricular cartilage of New Zealand white rabbit. IN the half of 20 rabbits, superoxide dismutase (SOD, 20,000 U/kg) was injected intravenously 30 minutes and 60 minutes after the flap elevation. On the 7th postoperative day, survival areas of the flaps were measured by image analysis system and the vascular network with the flaps were examined by micro fil cast. 40 flaps were divided as follows: proximally based venous flaps, distally based venous flaps, SOD treated proximally based venous flaps, SOD ttreated distally based venous flaps. The results were as follow: 1. The survival rate(79.39+/-9.24%) of the proximally based venous flaps were significantly higher than those(60.79+/-14.10%) of the distally based ones (p< 0.01). 2. SOD improved survival of the flap significantly (p< 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in the survival rates between proximally based venous flaps and SOD treated distally based venous flaps (p = 0.1785). 3. Revascularization was actively developed in the proximally based venous flaps and those flaps treated with SOD, but was minimal in the distally based venous flaps. These results suggested that the vascular pedicle would rather be located proximally than distally in designing the venous island flaps and that SOD treatment may be effective for the enhancement of survival of venous island flaps, especially in distally based ones.
