Comparison of Three Types of Hernioplasty Using Meshes for Adult Inguinal Hernia: Lichtenstein, Mesh-plug, Prolene Hernia System.
10.4174/jkss.2009.76.2.109
- Author:
Chan Joong CHOI
1
;
Ki Jae PARK
;
Sung Heun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. ksheun@dau.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Inguinal hernia;
Lichtenstein repair;
Mesh-plug repair;
Prolene Hernia Sy
- MeSH:
Adult;
Analgesics;
Edema;
Hematoma;
Hernia;
Hernia, Inguinal;
Herniorrhaphy;
Humans;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration;
Length of Stay;
Polypropylenes;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Wound Infection
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2009;76(2):109-114
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare three types of hernioplasty using a mesh: Lichtenstein, Mesh-plug and Prolene Hernia System. METHODS: From February 2002 to April 2007, we retrospectively studied the clinical outcome of 138 cases of adult inguinal hernia patients who had operations performed with the use of mesh. Three types of mesh operations were composed of Lichtenstein repair group (LR group; N=18), Mesh plug repair group (MR group; N=38) and Prolene hernia system group (PHS group; N=82). The Clinical features and outcomes of the three groups were compared by age, sex, operation time, lengths of hospital stay, numbers of post-operative intravenous analgesics, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS: Mean age of three groups was 50.2+/-20.7, 51.0+/-18.4 and 61.5+/-15.9 years for LR. MR, PHS groups, respectively. The PHS group was significantly older than other two groups (P=0.002). The sex, operation time and lengths of hospital stay were not significantly different among the three groups. Numbers of intravenous analgesics used after the operations were 1.7+/-1.2, 2.7+/-2.2, 3.3+/-2.0 in the LR, MR, PHS groups, respectively. A lesser amount of IV analgesics was injected into the LR group than the PHS group. Although some complications occurred such as wound infection, hematoma, dehiscence, testicular edema in the three groups, there were no significant differences among the three groups. There were no recurrences in all three groups. CONCLUSION: We could not find any better outcome among the LR, MR and PHS groups.
