Periareolar Reduction Mammoplasty.
- Author:
Bong Soo BAIK
1
;
Shin Il LEE
;
Dong Pill SHIN
;
Jae Woo PARK
;
Byung Chae CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Taegu, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Periareolar reduction mammoplasty
- MeSH:
Breast;
Cicatrix;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Macrostomia;
Mammaplasty*;
Operative Time;
Reoperation;
Skin;
Sutures
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2001;28(4):329-336
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The goals of the reduction mammoplasty are to reduce the volume of the breast, to create aesthetic shape that is stable over time, to maintain blood supply and innervation to the nipple-areolar complex, and to make fine limited scars. There are 3 rationales in our reduction mammoplasty. To reduce the scar, we perform the periareolar incision. To make effective reduction of the breast volume, and to preserve blood supply and innervation to the nipple-areolar complex, we use a central or an inferior pedicle technique. To prevent areolar widening, we use a purse-string suture. We performed the periareolar reduction mammoplasty to 36 breasts in 18 patients from Jul. 1998 to Jun. 2000. The mean follow up period was 8 months. The mean age was 41 and mean resection amount was 420 gm per breast. Most patients satisfied with their fine periareolar scars, adequate size of breasts and the innervation of the nipple-areolar complex. We applied this procedure to all kinds of macrostomia. The greatest advantage of the periareolar reduction mammoplasty is the inconspicuous limited scar. Other advantages over conventional technique include preservation of sensitivity to the nipple-areolar complex and shorter operative time. As disadvantages, 10 breasts(28%) showed areolar widening. In 8 of 10 breasts with areolar widening, purse-string suture was not applied in the skin flap margin of the outer circle and reoperation was executed to reduce the areolar size by excision of the widened areola. The application of the purse-string suture was carried out in 6 breasts. Two breasts with purse-string suture showed areolar widening possibly due to loosening of the purse-string suture knot. There were persistent periareolar wrinkles in 4 breasts and poor sensitivity to the nipple-areolar complex in 6 breasts in which more than 500 gm of breast tissue per breast was resected. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty is optimal for patients who require reduction of lesser than 500 grams per breast. In the severe macromastia with or without ptosis, inverted T-incision is preferable to the periareolar incision, and periareolar incision can be modified by adding wedge resection of the outer excess skin flap inferiorly which results in a periareolar and vertical scar below the nipple-areolar complex.
