Effect of Accreditation on Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests in Medical Laboratories.
10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.213
- Author:
Mi Ae JANG
1
;
Young Ahn YOON
;
Junghan SONG
;
Jeong Ho KIM
;
Won Ki MIN
;
Ji Sung LEE
;
Yong Wha LEE
;
You Kyoung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea. lywmd@schmc.ac.kr cecilia@schmc.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
The Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service;
The Korean External Quality Assessment Scheme;
Quality assurance;
Quality system management;
Standardization;
Accuracy
- MeSH:
Accreditation*;
Bias (Epidemiology);
Clinical Chemistry Tests;
Delivery of Health Care;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine*;
Glucose;
Korea
- From:Annals of Laboratory Medicine
2017;37(3):213-222
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Medical laboratories play a central role in health care. Many laboratories are taking a more focused and stringent approach to quality system management. In Korea, laboratory standardization efforts undertaken by the Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) and the Korean External Quality Assessment Scheme (KEQAS) may have facilitated an improvement in laboratory performance, but there are no fundamental studies demonstrating that laboratory standardization is effective. We analyzed the results of the KEQAS to identify significant differences between laboratories with or without KLAP and to determine the impact of laboratory standardization on the accuracy of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We analyzed KEQAS participant data on clinical chemistry tests such as albumin, ALT, AST, and glucose from 2010 to 2013. As a statistical parameter to assess performance bias between laboratories, we compared 4-yr variance index score (VIS) between the two groups with or without KLAP. RESULTS: Compared with the group without KLAP, the group with KLAP exhibited significantly lower geometric means of 4-yr VIS for all clinical chemistry tests (P<0.0001); this difference justified a high level of confidence in standardized services provided by accredited laboratories. Confidence intervals for the mean of each test in the two groups (accredited and non-accredited) did not overlap, suggesting that the means of the groups are significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed that practice standardization is strongly associated with the accuracy of test results. Our study emphasizes the necessity of establishing a system for standardization of diagnostic testing.
