Impact of Neurointensivist Co-management on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients Admitted to a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit.
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.6.1024
- Author:
Jeong Am RYU
1
;
Jeong Hoon YANG
;
Chi Ryang CHUNG
;
Gee Young SUH
;
Seung Chyul HONG
Author Information
1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neurosurgery;
Intensive Care Unit;
Critical Care Outcomes
- MeSH:
Brain Injuries;
Cause of Death;
Critical Care Outcomes;
Critical Care*;
Humans;
Intensive Care Units*;
Intracranial Hemorrhages;
Korea;
Mortality;
Neurosurgery;
Observational Study;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2017;32(6):1024-1030
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Limited data are available on improved outcomes after initiation of neurointensivist co-management in neurosurgical intensive care units (NSICUs) in Korea. We evaluated the impact of a newly appointed neurointensivist on the outcomes of neurosurgical patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). This retrospective observational study involved neurosurgical patients admitted to the NSICU at Samsung Medical Center between March 2013 and May 2016. Neurointensivist co-management was initiated in October 1 2014. We compared the outcomes of neurosurgical patients before and after neurointensivist co-management. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. A total of 571 patients were admitted to the NSICU during the study period, 291 prior to the initiation of neurointensivist co-management and 280 thereafter. Intracranial hemorrhage (29.6%) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (26.6%) were the most frequent reasons for ICU admission. TBI was the most common cause of death (39.0%). There were no significant differences in mortality rates and length of ICU stay before and after co-management. However, the rates of ICU and 30-day mortality among the TBI patients were significantly lower after compared to before initiation of neurointensivist co-management (8.5% vs. 22.9%; P = 0.014 and 11.0% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.010, respectively). Although overall outcomes were not different after neurointensivist co-management, initiation of a strategy of routine involvement of a neurointensivist significantly reduced the ICU and 30-day mortality rates of TBI patients.
