Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of 14C-urea Breath Test According to Counting Method for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection.
- Author:
Min Woo KIM
1
;
Seok Tae LIM
;
Seung Ok LEE
;
Myung Hee SOHN
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chonju, Korea. mhsohn@chonbuk.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Helicobacter pylori;
14C urea breath test;
Peptic ulcer disease
- MeSH:
Biopsy;
Breath Tests*;
Diagnosis*;
Dyspepsia;
Helicobacter pylori*;
Helicobacter*;
Humans;
Scintillation Counting;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
2005;39(1):21-25
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: 14C-urea breath test (UBT) is a non-invasive and reliable method for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a new and rapid 14C-UBT (Heliprobe method), which was equipped with Geiger-Muller counter and compared the results with those obtained by using the conventional method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with dyspepsia underwent gastroduodenoscopy and 14C-UBT. A 37 KBq 14C-urea capsule was administered to patients and breath samples were collected. In Heliprobe method, patients exhaled into a Heliprobe BreathCard for 10 min. And then the activities of the BreathCard were countered using Heliprobe analyzer. In the conventional method, results were countered using liquid scintillation counter. During gastroduodenoscopy, 18 of 49 patients were underwent biopsies. According to these histologic results, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of two different methods and compared them. Also we evaluated the concordant and disconcordant rates between them. RESULTS: In all 49 patients, concordant rate of both conventional and Heliprobe methods was 98% (48/49) and the discordant rate was 2% (1/49). Thirteen of 18 patients to whom biopsies were applied, were found to be HP positive on histologic results. And both Heliprobe method and conventional method classified 13 of 13 HP-positive patients and 5 of 5 HP-negative patients correctly (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%, accuracy 100%). CONCLUSION: The Heliprobe method demonstrated the same diagnostic performance compared with the conventional method and was a simpler and more rapid technique.
