The Effects of Erythromycin in Small-Bowel Follow-through.
10.3348/jkrs.2001.44.5.583
- Author:
Hyun Yong JANG
1
;
Young Hwan LEE
;
Kyung Jae JUNG
;
Duck Soo CHUNG
;
Ok Dong KIM
;
Jin Bok HWANG
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Intestines, diseases;
Intestines, radiography
- MeSH:
Administration, Oral;
Barium;
Consensus;
Erythromycin*;
Gastric Emptying;
Head;
Humans;
Ileum;
Jejunum;
Meals;
Methylcellulose;
Phenobarbital
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2001;44(5):583-588
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of erythromycin(EM), known to accelerate gastric emptying, in modified small-bowel follow-through(SBFT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 32 normal patients who underwent modified SBFT by oral administration of methylcellulose. In the EM injection group(n=20), 500 mg EM (3 mg/kg in pediatric patients) in 100 ml saline was infused intravenously over a 15-minute period prior to the administration of a barium meal, while in the control group(n=12), EM was not infused. Gastric emptying time(GET), small-bowel transit time(SBTT) for barium and methylcellulose, small-bowel transit(SBT) during the first 15 minutes, luminal diameter and quality of image were compared between the two groups. SBT was assigned 1, 2, 3, or 4 points, depending on the extent to which the barium head reached the proximal or distal jejunum, and the proximal or distal ileum during the initial 15-minute. Three radiologists reached a consensus as to image quality. RESULTS: Mean GET was significantly faster in the EM injection group (18.5 mins for 150 ml barium suspen-sion and 25.8 mins for 600 ml methylcellulose). The SBT score during the initial 15 minutes was significantly higher in the EM injection group (3.3 points) than in the control group (2.4 points), but mean SBTT was not sig-nificantly different between the two groups. Luminal diameter and image quality were also higher in the EM injection group. CONCLUSION: EM does not decrease SBTT but is highly effective for shortening gastric emptying time, helping to increase the range of fluoroscopic examination and improve image quality in modified small-bowel follow-through, especially in patients with delayed gastric emptying.
