Risk Factors of Microscopic Invasion in Early Gastric Cancer.
- Author:
Jong Ho CHOI
1
;
Yun Suhk SUH
;
Shin Hoo PARK
;
Seong Ho KONG
;
Hyuk Joon LEE
;
Woo Ho KIM
;
Han Kwang YANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Stomach neoplasm; Risk factors
- MeSH: Female; Frozen Sections; Gastrectomy; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors*; Seoul; Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2017;17(4):331-341
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of microscopic invasion to determine the adequate resection margin in early gastric cancer (EGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed that included patients who underwent gastrectomy for clinical early gastric cancer (cEGC) at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2010. After subtracting the microscopic resection margin from the gross resection margin for each proximal or distal resection margin, microscopic invasion was represented by the larger value. Microscopic invasion and its risk factors were analyzed according to the clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 861 patients were enrolled in the study. Microscopic invasion of cEGC was 6.0±12.8 mm, and the proportion of patients with microscopic invasion ≥0 mm was 78.4%. In the risk group, tumor location, pT stage, and differentiation did not significantly discriminate the presence of microscopic invasion. The microscopic invasion of EGC-IIb was 13.9±16.8 mm, which was significantly greater than that of EGC-I. No linear correlation was observed between the overall tumor size and microscopic invasion (R=0.030). The independent risk factors for microscopic invasion ≥20 mm were EGC-IIb vs. EGC-I/IIa/IIc/III (odds ratio [OR], 3.103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.533–6.282; P=0.002) and male vs. female sex (OR, 1.655; 95% CI, 1.012–2.705; P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and EGC-IIb were independent risk factors for microscopic invasion ≥20 mm. Examination of intraoperative frozen sections is highly recommended to avoid resection margin involvement, especially in cases of EGC-IIb.
