Perioperative Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Safety and Feasibility in an Interim Survival Analysis.
- Author:
Vikas OSTWAL
1
;
Arvind SAHU
;
Anant RAMASWAMY
;
Bhawna SIROHI
;
Subhadeep BOSE
;
Vikas TALREJA
;
Mahesh GOEL
;
Shraddha PATKAR
;
Ashwin DESOUZA
;
Shailesh V. SHRIKHANDE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords: Epirubicin; Oxaliplatin; Capecitabine; Stomach neoplasms; Resection; Gastrectomy; Lymph node; Involved
- MeSH: Capecitabine*; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cohort Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy*; Epirubicin*; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrectomy; Gastric Outlet Obstruction; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Multivariate Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms*; Survival Analysis*; Survival Rate
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer 2017;17(1):21-32
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival outcomes in locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with LA gastric cancer who were offered perioperative chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) from May 2013 to December 2015 at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. RESULTS: Among the 268 consecutive patients in our study, 260 patients (97.0%) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 200 patients (74.6%) underwent D2 lymphadenectomy, and 178 patients (66.4%) completed adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up period was 17 months. For the entire cohort, the median overall survival (OS), 3-year OS rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and 3-year PFS rate were 37 months, 64.4%, 31 months, and 40%, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly inferior in patients who presented with features of obstruction than in those who did not (P=0.0001). There was no difference in survival with respect to tumor histology (well to moderately differentiated vs. poorly differentiated, signet ring vs. non-signet ring histology) or location (proximal vs. distal). Survival was prolonged in patients with an early pathological T stage and a pathological node-negative status. In a multivariate analysis, postoperative pathological nodal status and gastric outlet obstruction on presentation significantly correlated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: EOX chemotherapy with curative resection and D2 lymphadenectomy is a suggested alternative to the existing perioperative regimens. The acceptable postoperative complication rate and relatively high resection, chemotherapy completion, and survival rates obtained in this study require further evaluation and validation in a clinical trial.
