Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating Physical Disability of Upper Extremity.
10.3346/jkms.2009.24.S2.S288
- Author:
Jung Ho PARK
1
;
Hee Chun KIM
;
Jae Hoon LEE
;
Jin Soo KIM
;
Si Young ROH
;
Cheol Ho YI
;
Yoon Kyoo KANG
;
Bum Sun KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Practice Guideline ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Disability Evaluation;
Range of Motion;
Upper Extremity Function
- MeSH:
*Disability Evaluation;
Hand Injuries/classification/physiopathology;
Humans;
Joint Diseases/classification/physiopathology;
Korea;
Muscles/physiopathology;
Peripheral Vascular Diseases/classification/physiopathology;
Program Development;
Sensation/physiology;
Severity of Illness Index;
Upper Extremity/*physiopathology
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2009;24(Suppl 2):S288-S298
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
While the lower extremities support the weight and move the body, the upper extremities are essential for the activities of daily living, which require many detailed movements. Therefore, a disability of the upper extremity function should include a limitation of all motions of the joints and sensory loss, which affects the activities. In this study, disabilities of the upper extremities were evaluated according to the following conditions: 1) amputation, 2) joint contracture, 3) diseases of upper extremity, 4) weakness, 5) sensory loss of the finger tips, and 6) vascular and lymphatic diseases. The order of 1) to 6) is the order of major disability and there is no need to evaluate a lower order disability when a higher order one exists in the same joint or a part of the upper extremity. However, some disabilities can be either added or substituted when there are special contributions from multiple disabilities. An upper extremity disability should be evaluated after the completion of treatment and full adaptation when further functional changes are not expected. The dominance of the right or left hand before the disability should not be considered when there is a higher rate of disability.
