Usefulness of Three-Dimensional Maximal Intensity Projection (MIP) Reconstruction Image in Breast MRI.
- Author:
Hyun Sung KIM
1
;
Bong Joo KANG
;
Sung Hun KIM
;
Jae Jeong CHOI
;
Ji Hye LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. lionmain@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Breast;
Magnetic resonance (MR);
Breast neoplasm
- MeSH:
Breast;
Breast Neoplasms;
Humans;
Imidazoles;
Nitro Compounds;
Nuclear Family;
Wisconsin
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2009;13(2):183-189
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) maximal intensity projection (MIP) reconstruction method in breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 54 breasts of consecutive 27 patients were examined by breast MRI. Breast MRI was performed using GE Signa Excite Twin speed (GE medical system, Wisconsin, USA) 1.5T. We obtained routine breast MR images including axial T2WI, T1WI, sagittal T1FS, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1FS, and subtraction images. 3D MIP reconstruction images were obtained as follows; subtraction images were obtained using T1FS and early stage of contrast-enhanced T1FS images. And then 3D MIP images were obtained using the subtraction images through advantage workstation (GE Medical system). We detected and analyzed the lesions in the 3D MIP and routine MRI images according to ACR BIRADS(R) MRI lexicon. And then we compared the findings of 3D MIP and those of routine breast MR images and evaluated whether 3D MIP had additional information comparing to routine MR images. RESULTS: 3D MIP images detect the 43 of 56 masses found on routine MR images (76.8%). In non-mass like enhancement, 3D MIP detected 17 of 20 lesions (85 %). And there were one hundred sixty nine foci at 3D MIP images and one hundred nine foci at routine MR images. 3D MIP images detected 14 of 23 category 3 lesions (60.9%), 11 of 16 category 4 lesions (68.87%), 28 of 28 Category 5 lesions (100%). In analyzing the enhancing lesions at 3D MIP images, assessment categories of the lesions were correlated as the results at routine MR images (p-value<0.0001). 3D MIP detected additional two daughter nodules that were descriped foci at routine MR images and additional one nodule that was not detected at routine MR images. CONCLUSION: 3D MIP image has some limitations but is useful as additional image of routine breast MR images.
