Change of Stages and Related Factors for Wearing of Hearing Protection Device among Noisy Workplace-workers.
10.4040/jkan.2010.40.5.736
- Author:
Young Mi KIM
1
;
Ihn Sook JEONG
Author Information
1. Korea Southern Power Co. Ltd, Busan Combined Cycle Power Plant, Yangsan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; English Abstract
- Keywords:
Noise;
Occupational;
Hearing;
Protective devices
- MeSH:
Adult;
Ear Protective Devices/*utilization;
Female;
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/*prevention & control;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Noise, Occupational;
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control;
Questionnaires;
Self Efficacy;
Workplace
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2010;40(5):736-746
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was done to identify the distribution and related factors for stage of change for wearing hearing protection devices (HPDs) by workers in environments with high noise. Predictors of Use of Hearing Protection Model and Trans-theoretical Model were tested. METHODS: The participants were 755 workers from 20 noisy work places in Busan and Gyeongnam. Data were collected from January to April 2008 using self-administered questionnaires, and analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: There were significant differences in social mode (OR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.06-1.73) between precontemplation/contemplation and preparation stage, in males (OR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.24-4.51), workers with high school education or less (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.28-2.78), shift workers (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.02-2.21), workers who previously worked in noisy places (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.20-2.34), and workers who had previous hearing examinations (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.25-2.85), in the social model (OR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.42-1.78), and self-efficacy (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) between workers in preparation and action stages, in length of time working in noisy work places (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.17-4.39), social model (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.08), and perceived benefit (OR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97) between action and maintenance stage. CONCLUSION: Social model was a common factor showing differences between two adjacent stages for wearing HPDs. The results provide data for developing programs to encourage workers to wear HPDs and application of these programs in work settings.
