Clinical Features of Henoch-Schonlein Purpura Gastroenteropathy without Purpura before Diagnosis.
- Author:
Jae Min OH
1
;
Jae Hong PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. jhongpark@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Henoch-Schonlein Purpura;
Gastroenteropathy
- MeSH:
Abdominal Pain;
Biopsy;
Busan;
Child;
Diagnosis*;
Duodenum;
Endoscopy;
Endoscopy, Digestive System;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal;
Exanthema;
Humans;
Incidence;
Medical Records;
Pediatrics;
Purpura*;
Purpura, Schoenlein-Henoch*;
Retrospective Studies;
Skin;
Stomach;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
Ulcer;
Ultrasonography;
Vasculitis
- From:Korean Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
2004;7(1):54-60
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) is a small-vessel vasculitic disease that most often affects the skin. Abdominal symptoms precede the typical purpuric rash of HSP in 14~36%. It is a challenge to diagnose HSP in the absence of a rash, because there are no biologic tests that can identify HSP with certainty, so we tried to find out the characteristic features of HSP gastroenteropathy without purpura before diagnosis. METHODS: This study included 82 children with HSP who had been admitted or visited outward of the Department of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Hospital from 1995 to 2000. The cases that the onset of purpura preceded or coincided that of abdominal pain were defined as purpura-positive group. The cases that the onset of abdominal pain preceded purpura more than 1 week and purpura was not presented till diagnosed as HSP gastroenteropathy were defined as purpura-negative group. We compared and analyzed the clinical features of the two groups by reviewing the medical records retrospectively. To ensure the diagnosis of HSP gastroenteropathy, we conducted upper GI series, abdominal ultrasonogram, abdominal CT, endoscopy and/or skin biopsy. RESULTS: The number of cases of purpura-positive group and purpura-negative group were 72 and 10, respectively. There is no difference between two groups in the incidence of clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. Children with HSP gastroenteropathy had characteristic erosive or ulcerative lesions in the stomach or duodenum on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or mural thickening of the small bowel on abdominal ultrasonogram, CT or upper GI series. Skin biopsy revealed leukocytoclastic vasculitis in 3 of them, although biopsy specimen was taken from any areas of normal-appearing skin. In purpura-negative group, 9 patients improved by steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: In purpura-negative group, there is no diagnostic feature on the laboratory findings and clinical features. Therefore, to diagnose HSP gastroenteropathy in patients with abdominal pain in the absence of the characteristic rash, careful observation of clinical features and laboratory data, and prompt application of available diagnostic tools such as gastrointestinal endoscopy, radiologic study and skin biopsy are recommended. Early use of corticosteroid may reduce the suffering in these patients.
