Cancer Cytogenetics: Methodology Revisited.
10.3343/alm.2014.34.6.413
- Author:
Thomas S K WAN
1
Author Information
1. Haematology Division, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. wantsk@hku.hk
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Cancer cytogenetics;
FISH;
Karyotyping;
Molecular cytogenetics
- MeSH:
Chromosome Aberrations;
Humans;
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence;
Karyotyping;
Leukemia/diagnosis/genetics/pathology;
Neoplasms/*diagnosis/genetics/pathology;
Prognosis
- From:Annals of Laboratory Medicine
2014;34(6):413-425
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The Philadelphia chromosome was the first genetic abnormality discovered in cancer (in 1960), and it was found to be consistently associated with CML. The description of the Philadelphia chromosome ushered in a new era in the field of cancer cytogenetics. Accumulating genetic data have been shown to be intimately associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of neoplasms; thus, karyotyping is now considered a mandatory investigation for all newly diagnosed leukemias. The development of FISH in the 1980s overcame many of the drawbacks of assessing the genetic alterations in cancer cells by karyotyping. Karyotyping of cancer cells remains the gold standard since it provides a global analysis of the abnormalities in the entire genome of a single cell. However, subsequent methodological advances in molecular cytogenetics based on the principle of FISH that were initiated in the early 1990s have greatly enhanced the efficiency and accuracy of karyotype analysis by marrying conventional cytogenetics with molecular technologies. In this review, the development, current utilization, and technical pitfalls of both the conventional and molecular cytogenetics approaches used for cancer diagnosis over the past five decades will be discussed.
