Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.
- Author:
Seo Gue YOON
1
;
Khun Uk KIM
;
Khun Young NOH
;
Jung Kyun LEE
;
Kwang Yun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Song Do Colorectal Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Rectal prolapse;
Laparoscopic suture rectopexy
- MeSH:
Analgesics;
Constipation;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Manometry;
Prolapse;
Rectal Prolapse*;
Recurrence;
Sutures*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
2002;18(2):89-94
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to eveluate the early results of the laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. METHODS: From May 1999 to July 2001, laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSR) was successfully performed in 26 patients and the results were compared to those of 5 patients with open suture rectopexy (OSR) and 6 patients with open resection rectopexy (ORR). Preoperative and postoperative functional assessment included Wexner's incontinence score, constipation score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative morbidity was minimal in all groups. Bowel function was resumed significantly sooner (P=0.001), the numbers of the analgesics injection were significantly fewer (P<0.001) and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P<0.001) in the LSR than in the open groups. Postoperatively, the anal resting and squeezing pressures increased slightly and Wexner's incontinence score decreased significantly in all groups of patients. Constipation score decreased slightly in all groups of patients after surgery. There was one mucosal prolapse recurrence after surgery in the LSR. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse can be performed safely. Recovery is uneventful and of shorter duration after the laparoscopic than after the open approach. Functional results are obtained similarly with both approaches.
