Comparison of condylar position in transcranial radiography and polytomography from Polytome-U.
- Author:
Kyung Soo NAH
1
;
Bong Hae CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
temporomandibular joint;
transcranial radiography
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Incidence;
Joints;
Radiography*;
Sex Distribution;
Temporomandibular Joint;
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
1998;28(2):329-338
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The authors examined the condylar position and shape of condylar process from the transcranial radiographs and polytomographs of the 130 temporomandibular joints of 65 patients who complained symptoms of temporomandibular disorder and the followings were obtained ; 1. The age and sex distribution of the 65 patients showed peak incidence in 2nd decade (27.7%) followed by 3rd (18.5%) and 4th decade (18.5%) and female predominance (87.7%). 2. In polytomography 64 joints (49.2%) showed consistent condylar position from lateral to medial and 39 joints (30.0%) of them showed agreement with those of transcranial radiographs. Among the 66 joints (50.8%) which showed changes in condylar position, 48 joints (36.9%) showed agreement with lateral and central tomographic and transcranial radiographic position. 41 joints (31.5%) showed disagreement in condylar position between the polytomographic and transcranial radiographic images. 3. When the condylar position was classified as anterior, central and posterior, the posterior position was the most frequent position, that is , 42.3% of the transcranial radiography and 42.3%, 49.2% and 38.5% of the lateral, central and medial polytomographic radiographs. 4. In polytomography 84 joints (64.6%) showed consistent condylar shape from lateral to medial and 74 joints (56.9%) of them showed agreement with those of transcranial radiographs. Among the 46 joints (35.4%) which showed changes in condylar shape, 40 joints (30.1%) showed agreement with lateral and central tomographic and transcranial radiographic shape. 41 joints (31.5%) showed disagreement in condylar shape between the polytomographic and transcranial radiographic images.
