Comparison of Near Retinoscopy, Retinoscopy Under Cycloplegia and Subjective Refraction.
- Author:
Gong Je SEONG
1
;
Ouk CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Hyperopia;
Myopia;
Refractive Errors;
Retinoscopy*
- From:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
1987;28(1):143-149
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The object of this study was to observe the refractive errors obtained by near retinoscopy, retinoscopy under cycloplegia and subjective refraction on 244 Korean eyes with refractive error below the age of 90. The results were as follows; A. Comparision between the refractive errors obtained by retinoscopy under cycloplegia and subjective retraction. 1. The difference of spherical powers was 0.59D. 2. The difference Of spherical powers was 0.49D in myopia and 0.76D in hyperopia. 3. The difference of spherical powers was 0.59D in Group I (under age 10), 0.64D in Group II (age 11~20) and 0.45D in Group III (age 21~30). 4. There was not statistically significant difference of spherical powers among the age groups but between myopia and hyperopia. 5. The difference of cylindrical powers was 0.07D. 6. The difference of cylindrical powers was 0.03D. in Group I, 0.12D in Group II and 0.07D in Group III. 7. There was no statistically significant difference of cylindrical powers among the age groups. B. Comparison between the refractive errors obtained by near retinoscopy and subjective refraction 1. The difference of spherical powers was 0.97D. 2. The difference of spherical powers was 0.92D in myopia and 1.05D in hyperopia. 3. The difference of spherical power was 1.03D in Group I, 0.94D in Group II and 0.92D in Group III. 4. There was neither statistically significant difference of spherical powers among tbe age groups nor between myopia and hyperopia. 5. The difference of cylindrical powers was 0.1D. 6. The difference of cylindrical powers was 0.18D in Group I, 0.11D in Group II and 0.04D in Group III. 7. There was no statistically significant defference of cylindrical powers among the groups. C. In this study, regression formula was Y=0.877+0,724X (X : adjusted spherical power obtained by near retinoscopy Y: spherical power obtained by retinoscopy under cycloplegia).
