Cholesteatoma of the Temporal Bone: MR Findings.
- Author:
Yoon Ok PARK
1
;
Eun Kyung YOUN
;
Eun Chul CHUNG
;
Young Uk LEE
;
Dong Ju KIM
;
Seung Byum CHIN
;
Joo Seob KEUM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Ear, abnormalities; Ear, MR; Temporal bone, MR; Cholesteatoma
- MeSH: Cholesteatoma*; Cholesterol; Ear, Inner; Ear, Middle; Granulation Tissue; Granuloma; Humans; Inflammation; Labyrinthitis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mastoid; Meningitis; Prospective Studies; Temporal Bone*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1998;39(1):1-6
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic capability of MR imaging for distinguishingcholesteatoma from other causes of inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the MR imagesof 17 patients with a fully opacified middle ear in whom CT of the temporal bone suggested cholesteatoma. Allpatients underwent middle ear surgery and cholesteatoma was verified in 15 cases, granulation tissue in 15,cholesterol granuloma in four and hemotympanium in one. For each lesion, MR and pathologic findings werecorrelated. RESULTS: All cases of cholesteatoma showed low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weightedimages. On T2-weighted images, 11 cases showed high signal intensity, while seven were less than CSF and four werethe same. Four cases revealed central low signal intensity with peripheral rim of high signal intensity. On GdDTPA-enhanced images, peripheral or marginal enhancement due to surrounding granulation tissue was noted in 12cases. Two appeared to be totally enhanced. One case of congenital cholesteatoma showed no enhancement. OnT2-weighted images, all cases of granulation tissue showed high signal intensity, and on neither T1- norT2-weighted images could these be distinguished from cholesteatoma. On Gd DTPA-enhanced study, all cases ofgranulation tissue were enhanced, and on T1WI, all cases of cholesterol granuloma showed homogeneous bright signalintensity on T1WI. One case of cholesterol granuloma in the mastoid showed bright signal intensity mixed withirregular areas of dark signal intensity. A further comparison of MR imaging with CT is that two case oflabyrinthitis and one of meningitis were diagnosed on Gd- enhanced T1-weighted images. CONCLUSION: Todifferentiate cholesteatoma from granulation tissue and cholesterol granuloma by the evaluation of their signalintensities and enhancement patterns, MR imaging is superior to CT. When there are cholesteatoma-associatedcomplications such as labyrinthitis or meningitis, postcontrast MR imaging can provide better information.
