Management of Hair Line Using Skin Graft after Tissue Expansion for the Auricular Reconstruction of Microtia.
- Author:
Sun Jae PARK
1
;
Chul Gyoo PARK
;
Sukwha KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Microtia;
Tissue expansion;
FTSG;
Hair;
Canaloplasty
- MeSH:
Cartilage;
Ear;
Ear Canal;
Ear, External;
Fascia;
Graft Survival;
Hair*;
Humans;
Ribs;
Skin*;
Tissue Donors;
Tissue Expansion*;
Transplants*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2000;27(3):329-333
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Reconstructing the ear with autogenous rib cartilage is one of the most preferred methods for microtic ear reconstruction. Sometimes, when using this method, the skin envelope size is not large enough for the cartilage framework. With tissue expansion, a more adequately sized hairless skin envelope can be developed. Usually we recommend that canaloplasty be delayed after external ear reconstruction. But when the external ear canal has been reconstructed before external ear reconstruction, the remaining hairless skin for an envelope is so deficient that even though using tissue expansion, it is nearly impossible to develop well-qualified hairless skin envelope. From January, 1996 to December, 1998, we reconstructed auricles using tissue expansion, followed by excision of hair-bearing skin and grafting of full-thickness skin in five microtic patients whose external ear canals had been reconstructed before external ear reconstruction. The skin donor area was the contralateral postauricular area. Two to three weeks after the skin graft, autogenous cartilage grafts followed. No graft was lost. Color and texture was well matched, and the hair-bearing tissue portions were almost completely removed. Our method has several advantages: 1) it uses local tissue maximally; 2) it leaves the capsule intact, which can improve flap circulation; 3) it may thin the flap as much as it can be, which can reveal well defined cartilage framework; 4) it allows easy removal of hair-bearing tissue portions; 5) it provides a well-vascularized bed for graft survival and preserves the temporoparietal fascia, which can be used for secondary reconstruction if necessary; 6) Tissue expansion can reduce the amount of hair-bearing portion which should be removed.
