Slot-Scan Digital Radiography of the Lower Extremities: a Comparison to Computed Radiography with Respect to Image Quality and Radiation Dose.
- Author:
Kwang Hwi LEE
1
;
Jong Won KWON
;
Young Cheol YOON
;
Sang Hee CHOI
;
Jee Young JUNG
;
Ji Hye KIM
;
Sang Jun LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study
- Keywords: Computed radiography; Slot-scan digital radiography; Lower extremities; Phantom
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Lower Extremity/*radiography; Male; Middle Aged; Radiation Dosage; *Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods; Young Adult
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2009;10(1):51-57
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the slot-scan digital radiography (SSDR) of the lower extremity region and the computed radiography (CR) method with respect to the image quality and radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 54 patients who underwent both the SSDR and CR of the lower extremities. The study evaluated and statistically compared the image quality of four features (outer cortex, inner cortex, trabeculae and intermuscular fat) at six different levels (pelvis, hip, femur, knee, tibia and ankle) between each method. The image quality was evaluated using a visibility scale, and the entrance skin dose was measured using a dosimeter at three different levels of a phantom (hip, knee, and ankle). RESULTS: The mean image visibility scale values for the SSDR method were significantly higher than for the CR method. The entrance skin dose for the SSDR method was 278 micro Gy at each level, compared to the entrance skin doses of the CR method, which were 3,410 micro Gy for the hip, 1,152 micro Gy for the knee, and 580 microGy for the ankle. CONCLUSION: Both the image quality and patient entrance skin dose data suggest that the SSDR method is superior to the CR method for the lower extremity musculoskeletal examination.
