Anatomic Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Children : Computerized Tomographic Analysis of Children Under 10 Years Old.
10.3340/jkns.2014.56.6.475
- Author:
Hojin LEE
1
;
Jae Taek HONG
;
Il Sup KIM
;
Moon Suk KIM
;
Jae Hoon SUNG
;
Sang Won LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anatomical morphometrics;
Cervical spine;
Pediatric population;
Screw placement
- MeSH:
Child*;
Humans;
Spine
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2014;56(6):475-481
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anatomical feasibility of 3.5 mm screw into the cervical spine in the pediatric population and to establish useful guidelines for their placement. METHODS: A total of 37 cervical spine computerized tomography scans (24 boys and 13 girls) were included in this study. All patients were younger than 10 years of age at the time of evaluation for the period of 2007-2011. RESULTS: For the C1 screw placement, entry point height (EPH) was the most restrictive factor (47.3% patients were larger than 3.5 mm). All C2 lamina had a height larger than 3.5 mm and 68.8% (51/74) of C2 lamina had a width thicker than 3.5 mm. For C2 pedicle width, 55.4% (41/74) of cases were larger than 3.5 mm, while 58.1% (43/74) of pedicle heights were larger than 3.5 mm. For pedicle width of subaxial spine, 75.7% (C3), 73% (C4), 82.4% (C5), 89.2% (C6), and 98.1% (C7, 1/54) were greater than 3.5 mm. Mean lamina width of subaxial cervical spine was 3.1 (C3), 2.7 (C4), 2.9 (C5), 3.8 (C6), and 4.0 mm (C7), respectively. Only 34.6% (127/370) of subaxial (C3-7) lamina thickness were greater than 3.5 mm. Mean length of lateral mass for the lateral mass screw placement was 9.28 (C3), 9.08 (C4), 8.81 (C5), 8.98 (C6), and 10.38 mm (C7). CONCLUSION: C1 lateral mass fixation could be limited by the morphometrics of lateral mass height. C2 trans-lamina approach is preferable to C2 pedicle screw fixation. In subaxial spines, pedicle screw placement was preferable to trans-lamina screw placement, except at C7.
