Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Ulcers of the Stomach on Computed Tomography.
10.3348/jkrs.2006.55.4.353
- Author:
Im Jeong SEO
1
;
Suk KIM
;
Jun Woo LEE
;
Yeon Joo JEONG
;
Ki Seok CHOO
;
Suk Hong LEE
;
Gwang Ha KIM
;
Tae Oh KIM
;
Hong Jae JO
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Korea. kimsuk@medimail.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach, CT;
Stomach, ulcer;
Stomach, neoplasms
- MeSH:
Discrimination (Psychology);
Endoscopy;
Lymphatic Diseases;
Mucous Membrane;
Multidetector Computed Tomography;
Stomach Neoplasms;
Stomach Ulcer;
Stomach*;
Ulcer*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2006;55(4):353-359
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings for differentiating benign ulcers from malignant ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 clinicopathologically proven benign ulcers that had been detected by both endoscopy and MDCT were the focus of this study. 26 ulcerative advanced gastric cancers and 26 early gastric cancers with ulceration, all of which had been surgically proven, were selected as a control group. Five of the 26 early gastric cancers that were confined to the mucosa and that were not detected on CT were excluded in this study. The following CT findings were reviewed by two radiologists; ulcer size, the degree of enhancement and the thickness of inner enhancing layer in the ulcer base, the total thickness and the enhancing inner layer thickness in the largest part of the thickened ulcer mound, the presence of ulcer that projected beyond the healthy lumen, and the presence of perigastric fat infiltration and perigastric lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: An indiscernible thin-walled ulcer base (less than 1.5 mm) and suboptimal enhancement of the ulcer base for the discrimination of benign gastric ulcers from the malignant gastric ulcers showed sensitivities of 100% (18/18) and 78% (14/18), respectively, with specificities of 98% (46/47) and 92% (43/47), respectively. Ulcer projection was more significantly present in benign ulcer (13/18, 72%) than in the malignant gastric ulcers (7/47, 15%). The enhancing inner layer thickness in the ulcer mound was significantly greater in the AGC (mean: 7.4 mm) than in the benign gastric ulcers (mean, 2.2 mm). There were insignificant differences for ulcer size, total thickness of the ulcer mound, the perigastric fat infiltration and perigastric lymphadenopathy between the benign and malignant gastric ulcers. CONCLUSION: MDCT is an additional helpful diagnostic tool when benign gastric ulcers are histologically difficult to distinguish from malignant gastric ones.
