Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: Where Are We Now?.
- Author:
Hiroshi KAWAKAMI
1
;
Takao ITOI
;
Naoya SAKAMOTO
Author Information
1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Pancreatic pseudocyst;
Walled-off necrosis;
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage;
Metal stent;
Endoscopic necrosectomy
- MeSH:
Abdominal Abscess/surgery;
Drainage/*methods;
Endosonography/*methods;
Humans;
Necrosis/surgery;
Pancreas/*pathology/surgery;
Pancreatic Diseases/*surgery;
Pancreatic Pseudocyst/surgery;
*Stents;
Surgery, Computer-Assisted/*methods;
Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
- From:Gut and Liver
2014;8(4):341-355
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Endoscopic drainage for pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has been increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical or percutaneous drainage. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) has become the standard of care and a safe procedure for nonsurgical PFC treatment. EUS-TD ensures a safe puncture, avoiding intervening blood vessels. Single or multiple plastic stents (combined with a nasocystic catheter) were used for the treatment of PFCs for EUS-TD. More recently, the use of covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMSs) has provided a safer and more efficient approach route for internal drainage. We focused our review on the best approach and stent to use in endoscopic drainage for PFCs. We reviewed studies of EUS-TD for PFCs based on the original Atlanta Classification, including case reports, case series, and previous review articles. Data on clinical outcomes and adverse events were collected retrospectively. A total of 93 patients underwent EUS-TD of pancreatic pseudocysts using CSEMSs. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 94.6% and 21.1%, respectively. The majority of complications were of mild severity and resolved with conservative therapy. A total of 56 patients underwent EUS-TD using CSEMSs for pancreatic abscesses or infected walled-off necroses. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 87.8% and 9.5%, respectively. EUS-TD can be performed safely and efficiently for PFC treatment. Larger diameter CSEMSs without additional fistula tract dilation for the passage of a standard scope are needed to access and drain for PFCs with solid debris.
