Reliability and Validity of the Upper Limb Physician's Rating Scale in Children with Cerebral Palsy.
10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.271
- Author:
Eun Sook PARK
1
;
Ji Woon JOO
;
Seon Ah KIM
;
Dong Wook RHA
;
Soo Jin JUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. werch@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Upper extremity;
botulinum toxin type A injection;
outcome measure;
Melbourne assessment;
unilateral upper limb function
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Arm/*physiopathology;
Cerebral Palsy/*physiopathology;
Child;
Child, Preschool;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
*Physicians;
Reproducibility of Results
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal
2015;56(1):271-276
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The Upper Limb Physician's Rating Scale (ULPRS) is a tool that assesses movement quality of the upper limbs. It is used as an outcome measure after botulinum toxin type A injection in children with cerebral palsy (CP). This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the ULPRS in children with spastic CP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with spastic CP (M:F=17:13) aged 5 to 13 years old were recruited. The ULPRS was scored based on recorded videotapes by four physicians on two separate occasions. The Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MUUL) was scored by an occupational therapist. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), 95% confidence intervals and weighted kappa statistics were calculated for the scores of ULPRS to obtain interrater and intrarater reliability. The relationship between ULPRS and MUUL was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The ICCs for the total ULPRS scores were 0.94 between raters and 0.99 to 1.00 within raters. The weighted kappa statistics for subitem scores for the ULPRS ranged from 0.67 to 1.00 within raters and from 0.46 to 0.86 between raters. The relationship between ULPRS and MUUL was strong (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.751; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the high reliability of the total ULPRS score within and between raters. A significant concurrent validity between ULPRS and MUUL also supports the clinical utility of the ULPRS as an outcome measure of spastic upper limb in children with CP.
