Outcomes of dental implant treatment in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: a systematic review.
- Author:
Kyoung Kyu KIM
1
;
Hun Mo SUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Agrressive periodontitis; Dental implants; Dental implantation; Systematic review
- MeSH: Aggressive Periodontitis; Chronic Periodontitis; Dental Implantation; Dental Implants; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infection Control; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Survival Rate; Tooth Loss
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2012;4(4):210-217
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the current literatures and to assess outcomes of implant treatment in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies considered for inclusion were searched in Pub-Med. The literature search for studies published in English between 2000 and 2012 was performed. Our findings included literature assessing implant treatment in patients with a history of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). All studies were screened according to inclusion criteria. The outcome measures were survival rate of superstructures, marginal bone loss around implant and survival rate of implants. All studies were divided into two follow-up period: short term study (< 5 years) and long term study (> or = 5 years). RESULTS: Seven prospective studies were selected, including four short-term and three long-term studies. The survival rates of the superstructures were generally high in patients with GAP, i.e. 95.9 - 100%. Marginal bone loss around implant in patients with GAP as compared with implants in patients with chronic periodontitis or periodontally healthy patients was not significantly greater in short term studies but was significantly greater in long term studies. In short term studies, the survival rates of implants were between 97.4% and 100% in patients with GAP-associated tooth loss, except one study. The survival rates of implants were between 83.3% and 96% in patients with GAP in long term studies. CONCLUSION: Implant treatment in patients with GAP is not contraindicated provided that adequate infection control and an individualized maintenance program are assured.
