Continence Rate and Oncological Feasibility after Total Transurethral Resection of the Prostate as an Alternative Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.
- Author:
Hee Jong JEONG
1
;
Dong Deuk KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. uro94c@wonkwang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Urinary incontinence;
Transurethral resection of prostate;
Prostatic neoplasms;
Prostate-specific antigen
- MeSH:
Blood Transfusion;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Hyponatremia;
Lymph Nodes;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Operative Time;
Pilot Projects;
Postoperative Complications;
Prospective Studies;
Prostate;
Prostate-Specific Antigen;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Recurrence;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate;
Urinary Incontinence
- From:International Neurourology Journal
2011;15(4):222-227
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The value of total transurethral resection of prostate cancer (TURPC) as an alternative therapy was first recognized by Hans J. Reuter. Thus, we conducted the study of prospectively collected data to verify total TURPC as an alternative therapy forlocalized prostate cancer. METHODS: From January 2008 to July 2011, 14 patients with a mean age of 76.1 years (range, 66 to 89 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated by prostatic resection by the corresponding author with curative intention. RESULTS: The mean duration of TURPC was 51.7 minutes (range, 30 to 120 minutes) and the mean amount of prostatic tissue resected was 21.2 g (range, 5 to 66 g). An intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusion was necessary in 2 cases. Hyponatremia was found in 7 patients. Six months after TURPC, 3 cases of grade 1 and 1 case of grade 2 incontinence were observed. Three patients in the high-risk group did not achieve a prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir of < or =0.2 ng/mL. PSA recurrence occurred in one case in our series. Newly developed lymph node or distant metastases were not observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, transurethral resection for prostate cancer can be performed with reasonable oncological results. The PSA nadir levels, and rates of biochemical failure and postoperative complications, including incontinence, were comparable with the published results for other procedures. TURPC is also inexpensive and non-invasive, and requires short hospitalization and a short surgical time without vesicourethral anastomosis.
