Determining and Managing Fetal Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures in Turkey.
10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1276
- Author:
Mustafa OZBAYRAK
1
;
Iffet CAVDAR
;
Mehmet SEVEN
;
Lebriz USLU
;
Nami YEYIN
;
Handan TANYILDIZI
;
Mohammad ABUQBEITAH
;
A Serdar ACIKGOZ
;
Abdullah TUTEN
;
Mustafa DEMIR
Author Information
1. Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey. drmozbayrak@hotmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Fetus;
Radiation effects;
Computed tomography;
Radiography
- MeSH:
Female;
Fetus/*radiation effects;
Gestational Age;
Head/radiation effects;
Humans;
Pregnancy;
*Radiation Dosage;
Radiation, Ionizing;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk;
Software;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
Turkey
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2015;16(6):1276-1282
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: We intended to calculate approximate fetal doses in pregnant women who underwent diagnostic radiology procedures and to evaluate the safety of their pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted hospitals in different cities in Turkey where requests for fetal dose calculation are usually sent. Fetal radiation exposure was calculated for 304 cases in 218 pregnant women with gestational ages ranging from 5 days to 19 weeks, 2 days. FetDose software (ver. 4.0) was used in fetal dose calculations for radiographic and computed tomography (CT) procedures. The body was divided into three zones according to distance from the fetus. The first zone consisted of the head area, the lower extremities below the knee, and the upper extremities; the second consisted of the cervicothoracic region and upper thighs; and the third consisted of the abdominopelvic area. Fetal doses from radiologic procedures between zones were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The average fetal doses from radiography and CT in the first zone were 0.05 ± 0.01 mGy and 0.81 ± 0.04 mGy, respectively; 0.21 ± 0.05 mGy and 1.77 ± 0.22 mGy, respectively, in the second zone; and 6.42 ± 0.82 mGy and 22.94 ± 1.28 mGy, respectively, in the third zone (p < 0.001). Our results showed that fetal radiation exposures in our group of pregnant women did not reach the level (50 mGy) that is known to increase risk for congenital anomalies. CONCLUSION: Fetal radiation exposure in the diagnostic radiology procedures in our study did not reach risk levels that might have indicated abortion.
