Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231
- Author:
Kwan Ho LEE
1
;
Eun Young KIM
;
Chan Heun PARK
;
Yong Lai PARK
;
Ji Sup YUN
;
Ga Young LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. subi0117@naver.com
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Thyroidectomy;
Surgical wound;
Silicones;
Thyroid neoplasms;
Surgical instruments
- MeSH:
Body Mass Index;
Cicatrix;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Incidence;
Silicones;
Surgical Instruments;
Thyroid Gland;
Thyroid Neoplasms;
Thyroidectomy*;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017;93(5):231-239
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The incidence of thyroid cancer is relatively high, especially in young women, and postoperative scarring after thyroidectomy is an important problem for both patients and clinicians. Currently, there is no available product that can be used for wound protection during thyroid surgery. We used the EASY-EYE_C, a new silicone-based wound protector. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of the EASY-EYE_C with surgical scars. We studied 66 patients who underwent conventional total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon from August 2015 to June 2016. At 6-week follow-up, a single blinded physician observed the wounds to make clinical assessments using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and a modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). RESULTS: There were no significant differences by sex, age, type of surgery, body mass index, length of wound, incision site (from sternal notch), or thyroid weight, but the duration of operation was significantly shorter in the experimental group (E group). The e-group also had better POSAS scores than the control group (C group), with means of 43.2 (standard deviation [SD], ±15.9) versus 68.3 (SD, ±21.5), respectively (P < 0.05). The modified SBSES and VSS scores were similar to those from the POSAS. CONCLUSION: In this study, all scores for evaluating outcomes were higher in the E group than in the C group. In addition, the operation time was significantly shorter in the E group. Therefore, the EASY-EYE_C may be useful for improving the cosmetic outcomes of conventional thyroid surgery.
