Evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia.
- Author:
Sang Hyuk PARK
1
;
Hyun Sook CHI
;
Young Uk CHO
;
Seongsoo JANG
;
Chan Jeoung PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Prognosis; Therapy; Related; AML
- MeSH: Alkylating Agents; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Karyotype; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Phenotype; Prognosis; Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
- From:Blood Research 2013;48(3):185-192
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Therapy-related AML (t-AML) occurs as a late complication of chemotherapy administered to treat a prior disorder. Prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome in t-AML have not yet been clearly defined; therefore, we evaluated these factors in this study. METHODS: Forty-eight patients diagnosed with t-AML within the past 10 years were enrolled, and their chemotherapy regimens categorized into 4 groups: alkylating agents (AK) only, topoisomerase II inhibitors (TI) and AK, TI only, and others. The prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Five (10.4%), 21 (43.8%), 9 (18.8%), and 13 (27.0%) patients were treated with AK only, AK and TI, TI only, and others, respectively. Patients with an AML M3 phenotype showed significantly longer overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 14.3 months, P=0.040) and disease-free survival (DFS; 61.2 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.049) than other phenotypes. In contrast, patients with a complex karyotype showed significantly shorter OS (7.9 vs. 31.3 months, P=0.008) and DFS (9.5 vs. 38.6 months, P=0.046); additionally, patients with chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities showed significantly shorter OS (9.1 vs. 30.7 months, P=0.011) than other phenotypes. Only the presence of a complex karyotype or AML M3 phenotype retained prognostic impact in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Only the AML M3 phenotype was identified as having a good prognosis, and this might suggest that it exhibits unique clinical features in t-AML patients. Moreover, our findings indicated that karyotype was the strongest prognostic indicator and predicted a poor prognosis for t-AML patients with a complex karyotype.
