Comparative Experimental Analysis on Several Anastomotic Techniques of the Colon.
- Author:
Kang Hong LEE
;
Chang Sik YU
;
Han Il LEE
;
Wan Soo KIM
;
Chang Nam KIM
;
Youn CHOI
;
Gyeong Hoon KANG
;
Mee Ra CHOO
;
Sang Kyu PARK
;
Jin Cheon KIM
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Stapling;
Anastomosis;
Colon
- MeSH:
Animals;
Breast Neoplasms*;
Breast*;
Cicatrix;
Colon*;
Colon, Transverse;
Colorectal Surgery;
Defecation;
Fibrosis;
Foreign-Body Reaction;
Humans;
Lymphatic Vessels;
Male;
Mastectomy;
Mastectomy, Radical;
Mastectomy, Segmental*;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Rectum;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Swine;
Telangiectasis;
Tensile Strength
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
1998;55(3):314-324
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Although the stapled anastomotic technique has achieved efficacy in gastrointestinal surgery, there are only a few experimental results comparing the physical properties of the anastomotic site, pathologic features of the healing process, and physiologic change after the operation. Moreover, there have been no comparative study among various stapled anastomotic techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of various stapled anastomotic techniques by comparing the physical properties of the anastomotic site, pathologic features of the healing process and physiologic change observed for the classical hand-sewn anastomotic technique with those observed for various stapled anastomotic techniques in the normal porcine colon and rectum. METHODS: Twelve male pigs were grouped into 4 according to the anastomotic techniques; standard Albert-Lembert two-layer hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled end-to-end anastomosis, stapled end-to-side anastomosis, and stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Each anastomotic technique was applied at 3 sites (ascending colon, transverse colon, and rectum). Groups of animals underwent a second surgery on the 4th week postoperatively, and the anastomotic properties were assessed with respect to the first day of defecation, bursting pressure, tensile strength, gross scar formation, microscopic inflammatory cell infiltration, telangiectasia, lymphangiectasia, foreign-body reaction, granulation and fibrosis. RESULTS: No significant difference among the respective anastomotic techniques was found with respect to the first day of defecation, bursting pressure, tensile strength, microscopic inflammatory cell infiltration, telangiectasia, and lymphangiectasia. However, more scar formation, foreign-body reaction, granulation and fibrosis were observed in the hand-sewn anastomosis. There was no significant difference among the groups of various stapled anastomotic techniques. CONCLUSION: According to this animal study, various stapled anastomoses were superior to the standard Albert-Lembert two-layer hand-sewn anastomosis with less scar formation, foreign-body reaction,granulation and fibrosis. In colorectal surgery, various stapled anastomotic techniques can be safely applied in accordance with the respective purpose and the anatomical characteristics.
