Productivity of SCI Korean medical papers: 1996-1997.
10.3346/jkms.1999.14.4.351
- Author:
Choon Shil LEE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Library and Information Science, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. cslee@sookmyung.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Review
- Keywords:
Bibliometrics;
Korea;
Medicine;
Periodicals/Statistics & numerical data;
Research/Statistics & numerical data
- MeSH:
Databases, Factual;
Human;
Korea;
Publishing/statistics & numerical data*;
Research/trends;
Research/statistics & numerical data*;
Schools, Medical/trends;
Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data;
Specialties, Medical/trends;
Specialties, Medical/statistics & numerical data*;
World Health
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
1999;14(4):351-358
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
In order to investigate the extent and growth of SCI publication activity of Korean medicine, DIALOG's SCISearch database was searched and the number of SCI Korean medical papers in each medical specialty was measured by publication year and by document type for 1996 and 1997. The percentage contribution of Korean medical papers to SCI database and the SCI publication productivity ratio were analyzed for each of 57 medical specialties. The data obtained in this study was compared with the data representing the 1980s and the data for the first half of the 1990s. The absolute productivity of SCI Korean medical papers as measured by the number of SCI Korean papers has increased about ten times from 306 papers in 1990 to 3,261 papers in 1997. More than 15% of SCI Korean publication output has resulted from six Korean medical journals indexed in SCI from 1995. The relative productivity of SCI Korean medical papers as measured by the percentage contribution from Korea to SCI and by its corresponding productivity ratio is not as impressive as the absolute productivity and its growth rate. It has increased three times from 0.245% to 0.642% during the same period. The relative productivity of SCI Korean medical publication output is not as great as the SCI Korean publication output of all sciences combined (1.02%).
