Effectiveness and Safety of Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients Aged 80 Years or Older.
- Author:
Wook Joo KIM
1
;
O Ki KWON
;
Chang Wan OH
;
Cheolkyu JUNG
;
Ji Sung LEE
;
Juneyoung LEE
;
Jung Hyun PARK
;
Youngchai KO
;
Myung Suk JANG
;
Mi Hwa YANG
;
Moon Ku HAN
;
Hee Joon BAE
Author Information
1. Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Thrombolysis;
Treatment outcome;
Aged 80 and over
- MeSH:
Aged;
Electrolytes;
Humans;
Logistic Models;
Odds Ratio;
Stroke;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Korean Journal of Stroke
2012;14(1):19-28
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis becomes an emerging therapeutic option for acute ischemic stroke. However, few reports exist on its use in the very elderly. We investigated whether there is a difference in the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) and/or intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis between patients aged > or =80 years and those aged <80 years. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients hospitalized within 12 hours from stroke onset were selected. We evaluated the effectiveness of thrombolysis with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months, and the safety with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sHT). The odds ratio (OR) of thrombolysis on the favorable mRS (0-2) was calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustments for potential confounders. Whether the effectiveness of thrombolysis is age-dependent or not was analyzed by introducing an interaction term (thrombolysisxage group) into multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 219 patients > or =80 years, 21% of patients received IV or IA or combined thrombolysis while 23% of 980 patients <80 years received thrombolysis (P=0.51). With respect to the favorable mRS, the adjusted ORs of thrombolysis were 1.70 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.68) in all subjects, 1.61 (0.58-4.49) in those > or =80 years, and 1.71 (1.05-2.78) in those <80 years. There was no significant interaction between age group and thrombolysis (P=0.91). With respect to sHT, the adjusted OR was 4.72 (1.94-11.45) in all subjects with no significant interaction (P=0.86). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that thrombolysis may be equally safe and effective in stroke patients aged > or =80 years versus <80 years.
