The Comparisons of Clincal Results of Ac rySof and PMMA Intraocular Lens Implantation in Diabetic Cataract: Six Months Follow-up.
- Author:
Kang Seok LEE
1
;
Im Tae KIM
;
Jong Wook HONG
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
AcrySof;
Anterior capsular fibrosis;
Diabetic cataract;
IOL-iris synechia;
Posterior capsular opacity;
PMMA(polymethyl-methalcrylate)
- MeSH:
Cataract*;
Fibrosis;
Follow-Up Studies*;
Incidence;
Lens Implantation, Intraocular*;
Lenses, Intraocular*;
Light Coagulation;
Polymethyl Methacrylate*;
Rehabilitation;
Vitrectomy
- From:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
1999;40(8):2160-2166
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
To compare the clinical results of AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL)and Polymethyl methacrylate(PMMA)IOL implantation in diabetic patients,a total of 58 eyes(48 patients)were analyzed.AcrySof IOL was implanted in 24 eyes with small incision technique,and PMMA IOL was implanted in 34 eyes with enlarged scleral wound.Posterior capsular opacity(PCO)developed in only 2 eyes in AcrySof group,while it occurred in 4 eyes in PMMA group.Anterior capsular fibrosis developed in 4 eyes and IOL-iris synechiae developed in 2 eyes in PMMA group after follow-up of 6 months.No statis-tically significant difference was found in the incidence of PCO between two groups(p>0.05). AcrySof IOL leads to faster visual rehabilitation than PMMA lens. Therefore,use of AcrySof IOL can be more beneficial in diabetic cataractpatients who might need laser photocoagulation or pars plana vitrectomy in the future.