Effect of a rewetting agent on dentin adhesion.
10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.011
- Author:
Young Gon CHO
1
;
Yil Yoon PARK
;
Young Gon LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea. ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dentin adhesion;
Air-dry;
Blot dry;
Rewetting agent;
Microleakage;
SEM
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Composite Resins;
Dentin*;
Humans;
Methylene Blue;
Molar;
Tooth;
Water
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
2003;28(1):11-22
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
This study compared the dentin adhesion to composite resin according to air-dry, blot dry, application of rewetting agent on air-dry or blot dry dentin surface by microleakag test and SEM observation. For microleakage test, class V cavity preparations with dentinal margins were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human molars. For SEM observation, occlusal dentin of 20 extracted human molars were exposed. After etched the dentin, prepared teeth were randomly divided into four groups; D group: air dry for 10-15 sec., B group: blot dry with moist cotton pellet, D-R group: air dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec., B-R group: blot dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec. Treated cavities and surfaces were filled or constructed using One-Step adhesives and Aelitefil composite resins. Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. For microleakage test, the specimens were thermocycled and soaked into 2% methylene blue. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests. For SEM observation, the specimens were bisectioned mesiodiatally. After decalcified and deproteinized, specimens were observed under SEM. The results of this study were as follows; 1. The microleakges on dentinal margin were the highest in D group compared with B group, D-R group, and B-R group(p<0.05). But there was no significant difference between B group, D-R group and B-R group. 2. D group showed gap and a few resin tags between dentin and composite resin. 3. B group, D-R group, and B-R groups showed close adaptation between dentin and composite resin. It showed that resin rags in B group were numerous and long, in D-R group were few and short, in B-R group were numerous and short or long. 4. Adhesive layer showed in D-R group (10 microm) and B-R group (3 microm) In conclusion, use of rewetting agent to dry dentin was efficient to dentin adhesion, also it did not provide reverse effect on blot dry dentin.
