Radiation Exposure to the Hand of a Spinal Interventionalist during Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures.
- Author:
Kazuta YAMASHITA
1
;
Hisanori IKUMA
;
Takuya TOKASHIKI
;
Takashi MAEHARA
;
Akihiro NAGAMACHI
;
Yoichiro TAKATA
;
Toshinori SAKAI
;
Kosaku HIGASHINO
;
Koichi SAIRYO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Radiation exposure; Spinal procedure; Fluoroscopy; Hand; Fingers
- MeSH: Fingers; Fluoroscopy; Forearm; Glass; Hand*; Prospective Studies; Radiation Exposure*; Radiation, Ionizing; Surgeons; Thorax; Thumb
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2017;11(1):75-81
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PURPOSE: During fluoroscopically guided spinal procedure, the hands of spinal surgeons are placed close to the field of radiation and may be exposed to ionizing radiation. This study directly measured the radiation exposure to the hand of a spinal interventionalist during fluoroscopically guided procedures. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Fluoroscopically guided spinal procedures have been reported to be a cause for concern due to the radiation exposure to which their operators are exposed. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated the radiation exposure of the hand of one spinal interventionalist during 52 consecutive fluoroscopic spinal procedures over a 3-month period. The interventionalist wore three real-time dosimeters secured to the right forearm, under the lead apron over the chest, and outside the lead apron over the chest. Additionally, one radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter was placed under the lead apron over the left chest and one ring radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter was worn on the right thumb. The duration of exposure and radiation dose were measured for each procedure. RESULTS: The average radiation exposure dose per procedure was 14.9 µSv, 125.6 µSv, and 200.1 µSv, inside the lead apron over the chest, outside the lead apron over the chest, and on the right forearm, respectively. Over the 3-month period, the protected radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter over the left chest recorded less than the minimum reportable dose, whereas the radiophotoluminescence glass ring dosimeter recorded 368 mSv for the thumb. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that the cumulative radiation dose measured at the dominant hand may exceed the annual dose limit specified by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Spinal interventionalists should take special care to limit the duration of fluoroscopy and radiation exposure.
