Analysis of location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septa.
10.5051/jpis.2010.40.2.56
- Author:
Won Jin LEE
1
;
Seung Jae LEE
;
Hyoung Seop KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry, Jeonju, Korea. cbuperio@chonbuk.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computed tomography;
Dental implants;
Maxillary Sinus
- MeSH:
Dental Implants;
Humans;
Lifting;
Maxilla;
Maxillary Sinus;
Prevalence;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2010;40(2):56-60
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The sinus lift procedure requires detailed knowledge of maxillary sinus anatomy and the possible anatomical variations. This study evaluated the location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septa using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This study was based on the analysis of CT images for posterior maxilla which were obtained from patients who visited Chonbuk National University Dental Hospital during the period of June 2007 to December 2008. With the exclusion of cases presenting any pathological changes, 236 maxillary sinuses in 204 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of the patients was 50.9. The cases were divided into two groups, an atrophy/edentulous segment and a non-atrophy/dentate segment, and maxillary sinus septa of less than 2.5 mm were not taken in-to consideration. The location of septa was also divided for analysis into 3 regions: the anterior (1st and 2nd premolar), middle (1st and 2nd molar) and posterior (behind 2nd molar) regions. RESULTS: In 54 (20.9%) of the 204 patients there were pathologic findings, and those patients were excluded from the analysis. Sinus septa were present in 58 (24.6%) of the 236 maxillary sinuses and in 55 (27%) of the 204 total patients. In the atrophy/edentulous ridge group (148 maxillary sinuses), 41 cases (27.7%) were found, and 17 cases (19.3%) were found in the non-atrophy/dentulous ridge group (88 maxillary sinuses). In terms of location, septa were found in 18 cases (27.3%) in the anterior, in 33 cases (50%) in the middle and in 15 cases (22.7%) in the posterior regions. CONCLUSIONS: In the posterior maxilla, regardless of type of ridge (atrophy/edentulous or non-atrophy/dentate), the anatomical variation of sinus septa is diverse in its prevalence and location. Thus, accurate information on the maxillary sinus of the patient is essential and should be clearly understood by the surgeon to prevent possible complications during sinus lifting.
