The Necessity for Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Colonic Resection and Primary Anastomosis.
- Author:
Man Ki KIM
1
;
Dong Wan KANG
;
Ji Hun KIM
;
Byung Ho SUN
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, Sae Gang General Hospital, Pusan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Mechanical bowel preparation;
Colonic resection;
Primary anastomosis
- MeSH:
Anastomotic Leak;
Colon*;
Colorectal Surgery;
Colostomy;
Humans;
Incidence;
Mortality;
Postoperative Complications;
Retrospective Studies;
Sepsis;
Wound Infection;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
1999;56(1):99-105
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The results of recent reports suggest that mechanical bowel preparation before colonic resection and primary anastomosis may be unnecessary. To determine whether mechanical bowel preparation influences the incidence of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery, the records of patients who had undergone colonic or rectal resection were retrospectively reviewed. METHODS: Between March 1992 and October 1997, colonic resection and primary anastomosis without colostomy was performed on 56 patients. Among these, 27 patients had undergone mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before surgery, and 29 patients had not. We compared the data from both groups with respect to wound infection, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal sepsis and death. RESULTS: The postoperative complication and mortality rates were similar in the two groups. Wound infection occurred in seven patients (four with MBP, three without), and the incidence of wound infection was similar in the two groups (14.8% versus 10.3%, P=0.700). Wound disruption occurred in two patients (one with MBP, one without). Anastomotic leaks occurred in two patients who had undergone bowel preparation. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.6% (7.4% versus 0%), but the incidence of anastomotic leaks was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.228). No intra-abdominal sepsis was clinically apparent in either group. There was one death, a patient who had undergone bowel preparation. The mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.482). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that mechanical bowel preparation before colonic resection and primary anastomosis may be unnecessary, so routine MBP should be further scrutinized.
