Clinical Study of a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy after a Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.
- Author:
Jae Yoon LEE
1
;
Byung Sun CHO
;
Yoe Dae YOON
;
Yoon Jung KANG
;
Ju Seung PARK
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, Eul Ji College of Medicine.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Percutaneous cholecystostomy
- MeSH:
Cholecystectomy;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*;
Cholecystitis, Acute;
Cholecystostomy*;
Dilatation;
Drainage;
Edema;
Gallbladder;
Gallstones;
Humans;
Inflammation;
Postoperative Complications;
Sex Distribution;
Tissue Adhesions
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
1999;56(1):112-116
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: A laparoscopic cholecystectomy has many clinical advantages and is now recognize as the choice for treatment for gallstones. However a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is often not feasible or is converted to the conventional open method in patients with acute cholecystitis because of surrounding adhesion, tissue edema, and high postoperative complications. Lately, good clinical results have been reported by many authors for a percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Between January 1996 and March 1997, 56 acute cholecystitis patients were surgically treated in our institution. Thirteen patients underwent percutaneous drainage followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group I). Also a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without a prior percutaneous cholecystostomy was attempted in 43 patients (Group II). RESULTS: There were no differences in the age and the sex distributions, the chief complaints on admission, and the severity of inflammation between the two groups. The only significant difference was the wall thickness of the gallbladder on postoperative pathologic examinations, 4.7 mm for Group I and 6.2 mm Group II (p=0.038). For the patients in Group I, percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder continued for 5.4 days on average, and the cholecystectomy was usually performed about 15 days later. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy was possible in 10 patients (76%) in Group I, but had to be converted to the open method in 3 patients. In Group II, only 17 patients (39.5%) out of 43 underwent a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In other words, the open conversion rate was 24% in Group I and 60.5% in Group II. The wall thicknesses of the gallbladder excised laparoscopically were 3.98 mm and those of the conventionally removed gallbladder were 6.96 mm on average. This difference in the wall thickness was statistically significant (p=0.013) and was the only factor related with the open conversion rate. CONCLUSIONS: We think that a laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed several days after percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder to eliminate acute inflammation may be recommended for management of acute cholecystitis patients with severe clinical symptoms and ultrasonographic findings of marked gallbladder dilatation or pericholecystic fluid collection.
