Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Resectable Stage III/IV Hypopharyngeal Cancer.
- Author:
Jun Won KIM
1
;
Mi Sun KIM
;
Se Heon KIM
;
Joo Hang KIM
;
Chang Geol LEE
;
Gwi Eon KIM
;
Ki Chang KEUM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Hypopharyngeal neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Treatment outcome; Organ preservation
- MeSH: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy*; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms*; Induction Chemotherapy; Laryngectomy; Organ Preservation; Pharyngectomy; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant*; Treatment Outcome
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(1):45-53
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes for locally advanced resectable hypopharyngeal cancer between organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery followed by radiotherapy (SRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 91 patients with stage III/IV hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy (RT). In the CRT group (n=34), 18 patients were treated with concurrent CRT and 16 patients with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent CRT. In the SRT group (n=57), six patients were treated with total laryngopharyngectomy, 34 patients with total laryngectomy (TL) and partial pharyngectomy (PP), and 17 patients with PP, which were followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (n=41) or CRT (n=16). The median RT dose was 70 Gy for CRT and 59.4 Gy for SRT. RESULTS: Five-year local control (84.1% vs. 90.9%), and disease-free survival (DFS, 51.0% vs. 52.7%) and overall survival (OS, 58.6% vs. 56.6%) showed no significant difference between the CRT and SRT groups. The functional larynx-preservation rate was higher in the CRT group (88.2% vs. 29.8%). Treatment-related toxicity, requiring surgical intervention, occurred more frequently in the SRT group (37% vs. 12%). In the SRT group, TL resulted in a significantly higher DFS than larynx-sparing surgery (63.9% vs. 26.5%, p=0.027). Treatment outcome of the SRT group improved when only patients with TL were considered (n=40); however, 5-year OS (67.1% vs. 58.6%, p=0.830) and DFS (63.9% vs. 51.0%, p=0.490) did not improve significantly when compared to the CRT group. CONCLUSION: Organ preserving CRT provided a treatment outcome that is comparable to SRT for locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer, while offering an opportunity for functional larynx-preservation and reduced treatment-related toxicity.
