The placement of an Implantable Chemoport via the External Jugular Vein as a Primary Route.
10.3348/jkrs.2008.58.3.237
- Author:
Moonsang AHN
1
;
Byung Seok SHIN
;
Mi Hyun PARK
Author Information
1. Department of General Sugery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Korea. starzan@chollian.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Catheterization, central venous;
Catheters, indwelling;
Jugular veins
- MeSH:
Catheterization;
Catheterization, Central Venous;
Catheters;
Catheters, Indwelling;
Embolism, Air;
Humans;
Jugular Veins;
Pneumothorax;
Tachycardia;
Thrombosis;
Veins
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2008;58(3):237-242
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness and safety of the placement of an implantable chemoport via external jugular vein as a primary route for chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and June 2007, a total of 108 implantable chemoports were placed on 325 patients for chemotherapy via the external jugular vein as a primary route. We placed a 9.6 F single lumen chemoport using a surgical procedure (n=89) and an interventional procedure (n=19), and evaluated the duration of catheterization days and treatment complications. RESULTS: An implantable chemoport was successfully installed in all cases. Furthermore, the duration of catheterization ranged from 2 to 461 days (mean: 187 days, total catheter days: 21,994). In addition, a total of 85 chemoports were removed due to complications (n=7) and termination of chemotherapy (n=78). A transient pulmonary air embolism occurring during a procedure was observed in one case. No pneumothorax or catheter malpositions were observed in the study subjects. Two chemoports were removed two days after implantation due to persistent tachycardia. In addition, five late complications occurred, which resulted in catheter occlusion (3 cases) (3%, 0.14/1000 catheter day) and infection in (2 cases) (2%, 0.09/1000 Catheter days). Lastly, no symptoms were attributed to a central vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the implantation of chemoports via the external jugular vein is a safe procedure. Moreover, the selection of the external jugular vein as a primary route is useful in determining chemoport insertion locations.
