Stratified Sampling Design Based on Data Mining.
10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.186
- Author:
Yeonkook J KIM
1
;
Yoonhwan OH
;
Sunghoon PARK
;
Sungzoon CHO
;
Hayoung PARK
Author Information
1. Technology Management, Economics and Policy Graduate Program, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. hayoungpark@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Sampling Studies;
Decision Trees;
Data Mining
- MeSH:
Data Mining;
Decision Trees;
Efficiency;
Health Personnel;
Humans;
Inpatients;
Insurance Carriers;
Insurance, Health;
Korea;
Ophthalmology;
Population Density;
Republic of Korea;
Sampling Studies;
Specialization
- From:Healthcare Informatics Research
2013;19(3):186-195
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To explore classification rules based on data mining methodologies which are to be used in defining strata in stratified sampling of healthcare providers with improved sampling efficiency. METHODS: We performed k-means clustering to group providers with similar characteristics, then, constructed decision trees on cluster labels to generate stratification rules. We assessed the variance explained by the stratification proposed in this study and by conventional stratification to evaluate the performance of the sampling design. We constructed a study database from health insurance claims data and providers' profile data made available to this study by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of South Korea, and population data from Statistics Korea. From our database, we used the data for single specialty clinics or hospitals in two specialties, general surgery and ophthalmology, for the year 2011 in this study. RESULTS: Data mining resulted in five strata in general surgery with two stratification variables, the number of inpatients per specialist and population density of provider location, and five strata in ophthalmology with two stratification variables, the number of inpatients per specialist and number of beds. The percentages of variance in annual changes in the productivity of specialists explained by the stratification in general surgery and ophthalmology were 22% and 8%, respectively, whereas conventional stratification by the type of provider location and number of beds explained 2% and 0.2% of variance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that data mining methods can be used in designing efficient stratified sampling with variables readily available to the insurer and government; it offers an alternative to the existing stratification method that is widely used in healthcare provider surveys in South Korea.
