A Retrospective 10-Year, Single-Institution Study of Carotid Endarterectomy with a Focus on Elderly Patients.
- Author:
Hojong PARK
1
;
Tae Won KWON
;
Sun U KWON
;
Dong Wha KANG
;
Jong S KIM
;
Young Soo CHUNG
;
Sung SHIN
;
Youngjin HAN
;
Yong Pil CHO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: endarterectomy; carotid; carotid stenosis; stroke
- MeSH: Aged*; Aging; Carotid Artery, Internal; Carotid Stenosis; Comorbidity; Endarterectomy; Endarterectomy, Carotid*; Humans; Life Expectancy; Male; Medical Records; Mortality; Retrospective Studies*; Stroke
- From:Journal of Clinical Neurology 2016;12(1):49-56
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study evaluated the outcome following surgery for carotid artery stenosis in a single institution during a 10-year period and the relevance of aging to access to surgery. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2010, 649 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) were performed in 596 patients for internal carotid artery occlusive disease at our institution; 596 patients received unilateral CEAs and 53 patients received bilateral CEAs. Data regarding patient characteristics, comorbidities, stroke, mortality, restenosis, and other surgical complications were obtained from a review of medical records. Since elderly and high-risk patients comprise a significant proportion of the patient group undergoing CEAs, differences in comorbidity and mortality were evaluated according to age when the patients were divided into three age groups: <70 years, 70-79 years, and > or =80 years. RESULTS: The mean age of the included patients was 67.5 years, and 88% were men. Symptomatic carotid stenosis was observed in 65.7% of patients. The rate of perioperative stroke and death (within 30 days of the procedure) was 1.84%. The overall mortality rate was higher among patients in the 70-79 years and >80 years age groups than among those in the <70 years age group, but there was no significant difference in stroke-related mortality among these three groups. CONCLUSIONS: CEA over a 10-year period has yielded acceptable outcomes in terms of stroke and mortality. Therefore, since CEA is a safe and effective strategy, it can be performed in elderly patients with acceptable life expectancy.
