Comparison of an Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Perioperative Hemodynamics, Sedation Quality, and Postoperative Pain Control.
10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1485
- Author:
Jin Woo CHOI
1
;
Jin Deok JOO
;
Dae Woo KIM
;
Jang Hyeok IN
;
So Young KWON
;
Kwonhui SEO
;
Donggyu HAN
;
Ga Young CHEON
;
Hong Soo JUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. flood1@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dexmedetomidine;
Fentanyl;
Remifentanil;
Surgery;
Pain Control;
Hemodynamic Stability
- MeSH:
Blood Pressure;
Dexmedetomidine*;
Double-Blind Method;
Fentanyl*;
Heart Rate;
Hemodynamics*;
Humans;
Hysterectomy;
Ketorolac;
Pain, Postoperative*;
Vital Signs
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2016;31(9):1485-1490
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
We aimed to compare fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine with respect to hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain control and achievement of sedation at the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). In this randomized double-blind study, 90 consecutive total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl (1.0 µg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.4 µg/kg/hr infusion (FK group, n = 30), or remifentanil (1.0 µg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.08 µg/kg/min infusion (RK group, n = 30), or dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) over 10 minutes followed by a 0.5 µg/kg/hr infusion (DK group, n = 30) initiating at the end of main procedures of the operation to the time in the PACU. A single dose of intravenous ketorolac (30 mg) was given to all patients at the end of surgery. We respectively evaluated the pain VAS scores, the modified OAA/S scores, the BIS, the vital signs and the perioperative side effects to compare the efficacy of fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Compared with other groups, the modified OAA/S scores were significantly lower in DK group at 0, 5 and 10 minutes after arrival at the PACU (P < 0.05), whereas the pain VAS and BIS were not significantly different from other groups. The blood pressure and heart rate in the DK group were significantly lower than those of other groups at the PACU (P < 0.05). DK group, at sedative doses, had the better postoperative hemodynamic stability than RK group or FK group and demonstrated a similar effect of pain control as RK group and FK group with patient awareness during sedation in the PACU. (World Health Organization registry, KCT0001524).
