A comparative study on the accuracy of impression body according to the types of impression tray.
10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.48
- Author:
Hyun Jung YI
1
;
Jong Hwa LIM
;
Joon Seok LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea. joon322@dku.edu
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Dental impression technique;
Implants
- MeSH:
Dental Impression Technique;
Polycarboxylate Cement
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2010;48(1):48-54
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of impression body taking by the closed and the open tray impression technique with 3 types of impression tray. Individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate tray were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine closed tray impressions were taken by individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate stock tray, respectively with polyether impression material. 9 open tray impressions were also acquired by same manner. Precision analysis on the master models was performed by attaching the reference frameworks with alternate single screws and measuring the vertical fit discrepancy of respective analogues in working cast with a stereo microscope. Data were analyzed by 1 way ANOVA and independent t-test. RESULTS: The average fit accuracy of impression bodies was calculated. With the closed tray impression technique, there were significant statistical differences in vertical fit discrepancy according to the types of tray. The individual tray group showed the lowest value and the polycarbonate stock tray group represented the highest. With the open tray impression technique, there was no significant difference in vertical fit discrepancy. Significant statistical difference in vertical fit discrepancy was found between the open and the closed impression technique with the polycarbonate stock tray. CONCLUSION: From the results above, more precise impressions could be acquired by the rigid individual tray compared with the polycarbonate stock tray. It was hard to get consistent accuracy impressions by the closed tray impression technique with polycarbonate stock trays.
