Comparative Study on Bowel Preparation Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid Containing Polyethylene Glycol by Adding Either Simethicone or 1 L of Water in Health Medical Examination Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
10.4166/kjg.2016.67.4.189
- Author:
Se Hwan YEO
1
;
Jae Hoon KWAK
;
Yeo Un KIM
;
Tae Ho KWON
;
Jeong Bae PARK
;
Jun Hyung PARK
;
Yong Kook LEE
;
Yun Jeong LIM
;
Chang Heon YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea. chhyang@dongguk.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Colonoscopy;
Bowel preparation solutions
- MeSH:
Adult;
Ascorbic Acid/*chemistry;
Cathartics/adverse effects/chemistry/*pharmacology;
Colon/*drug effects;
Colonoscopy;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Patient Compliance;
Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects/*chemistry/pharmacology;
Prospective Studies;
Simethicone/*chemistry;
Water/*chemistry
- From:The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology
2016;67(4):189-197
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are no studies that looked into the bubble eliminating efficacy of polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEGA), which has been one of the shortcomings of polyethylene glycol (PEG). In this study, we compared newly introduced PEGA regimen by adding either simethicone or 1 L of water. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out at Dongguk Universtiy Gyeongju Hospital from July 2014 to September 2014. A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups; PEGA group (n=30) which served as control, simethicone addition group (n=30) to which simethicone 400 mg was additionally prescribed, and water addition group (n=30) to whom additional 1 L of water was given. Cleansing effectiveness, gas elimination efficacy, side effects, and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. RESULTS: PEGA group demonstrated the highest cleansing effectiveness, but there was no statistically significant difference among the groups. Simethicone addition group showed significantly lesser amount of bubbles than the other groups (2.57±2.05 vs. 1.10±1.83 vs. 2.60±2.84, p=0.017). The rates of side effects in each group were 20.00% vs. 16.77% vs. 53.33%. Water addition group had significantly more side effects than the PEGA group and the simethicone addition group (p=0.003). The patient satisfaction score of each group was 3.37±0.85 vs. 3.73±0.74 vs. 3.20±0.66 with simethicone addition group showing significantly higher satisfaction than water addition group (p=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: PEGA bowel preparation agent showed satisfactory bowel cleansing despite the decrease in dosage, and addition of simethicone resulted in better bubble elimination.
