Serotonin transporter occupancy of SKL10406 in humans: comparison of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling methods for estimation of occupancy parameters.
10.12793/tcp.2014.22.2.83
- Author:
Jung Shin PARK
1
;
Jongtae LEE
;
Jeffrey MEYER
;
Palanichamy ILANKUMARAN
;
Seunghoon HAN
;
Dong Seok YIM
Author Information
1. Department of Pharmacology, PIPET (Pharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea. yimds@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
serotonin transporter;
NONMEM;
PET;
SKL10406
- MeSH:
Brain;
Dopamine;
Healthy Volunteers;
Humans;
Positron-Emission Tomography;
Serotonin;
Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins*
- From:Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
2014;22(2):83-91
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
SKL10406, triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor, is a novel antidepressant candidate. A PET study was performed to investigate the occupancies of serotonin and dopamine transporters (SERT and DAT) in human brain, and the relationship between SKL10406 concentration and SERT occupancy was assessed using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling methods. Fifteen healthy volunteers were given SKL10406 100 mg/day for 6 days or 150 mg/day for 6 days after 100 mg/day for 4 days. Each subject underwent full PK sampling for SKL10406 and PET scans at predose, 4 h and 16 h after dosing at a steady state to investigate the occupancies of SERT and DAT using 11C-DASB and 11C-PE2I, respectively. Naive pooled method (NPM) and nonlinear mixed-effect methods (ME) including a direct ME (DME) and an effect compartmental ME (EME) were used (NONMEM Ver. 7.2). Six and five subjects completed the studies for SERT and DAT, respectively. The final estimates of Emax (53.4%) and EC50 (11.8 ng/mL) from DME were relatively lower than those from NPM (Emax, 74.1%; EC50, 36.8 ng/mL) and EME (Emax, 68.6%; EC50, 40.2 ng/mL). DAT occupancy results were not modeled because of lower occupancies. The results showed that the dosage regimens may be applied in patient studies. However, difference between estimation methods alerts that ME may not be a recommendable analysis tool for sparsely sampled PET scan data.
